Professional Judgment: Thinking, not Just Calculating

Keywords: professional judgment, codification of knowledge, accounting, financial reporting.

Abstract

The article reveals the essence of professional judgment as a key element in the field of audit, accounting and related activities, which ensures flexible, informed decision-making in complex or non-standard situations.

It is argued that professional judgment needs to be employed by specialists in adapting international standards to the national context, assessing risks, determining materiality and choosing appropriate verification methods, collecting and evaluating audit evidence, and forming an opinion on financial reporting.

The study demonstrates that without professional judgment it is impossible to ensure the quality of the audit, the reliability of financial reporting and compliance with regulatory requirements. This is not only technical competence, but also a manifestation of ethics, experience, and responsibility that builds trust in the accounting and auditing profession.It is argued that professional judgment is critically important due to its being a bridge between standards and reality. In complex or non-standard situations, no regulation provides a ready-made answer. The judgment allows the auditor, accountant or another specialist to choose a reasoned decision taking into account the risks, context, economic essence of operations and expectations of reporting users. It ensures flexibility without loss of responsibility, adaptation of international norms to national practice, trust in the professional community, quality, ethics and relevance of generated reports and professional decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Pozharytska I. (2013). Profesiine sudzhennia audytora: hnoseolohichnyi aspect [Auditor’s professional judgment: epistemological aspect]. Ekonomichnyi analiz – Economic Analysis, 14 (1), 134–139 [in Ukrainian].
2. Kundrya-Vysotska, O., Wagner, I., & Demko, I. (2023). Ekstrapoliatsiia profesiinoho sudzhennia v oblikovii systemi: znachennia ta vplyv na rozvytok [Extrapolation of professional judgment in the accounting system significance and impact on development]. Visnyk Ekonomiky – Bulletin of Economics, 2, 89–102. DOI: 10.35774/visnyk2023.02.089 [in Ukrainian].
3. Kryvoruchko, M., & Moiseenko, A. (2024). Suspilnyi interes v konteksti etychnoi osnovy profesiinoho sudzhennia u sferi obliku i audytu [Public interest in the context of the ethical basis of professional judgment in the field of accounting and auditing]. Bisnes Inform – Business Inform, 10, 332–338. DOI: 10.32983/2222-4459-2024-10-332–338 [in Ukrainian].
4. Korinko, D., & Manko, N. (2018). Kumuliatyvnyi efekt lokalnykh sudzhen audytora [Cumulative effect of local auditor judgments]. Bisnes Inform – Business Inform, 9, 140–148. DOI: 10.32983/2222-4459-2024-10-332-338 [in Ukrainian].
5. IAASB (2021). Mizhnarodni standarty kontroliu yakosti, audytu, ohliadu, inshoho nadannia vpevnenosti ta suputnikh posluh [International Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services]. Retrieved from https://www.iaasb.org/publications/mizhnarodni-standarti-kontrolyuyakosti-auditu-oglyadu-inshogo-nadannya-vpevnenosti-ta-suputnikh-0 [in Ukrainian].
6. Vechorkovsky, R. (2004) Rozvytok konkurentnykh perevah pidpryiemstv maloho i serednoho biznesu [Development of competitive advantages of small and medium-sized businesses]. Marketynhovi doslidzennia v Ukraini [Marketing research in Ukraine]: the 3rd International Scientific and Practical Conference (p. 54–58.). Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics [in Ukrainian].
7. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2022). Pro ofitsiinu statystyku: [Official Statistics]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2524-20#Text [in Ukrainian].
8. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (1999). Pro bukhhalterskyi oblik ta finansovu zvitnist v Ukraini Accounting and Financial Reporting in Ukraine]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-14#Text/ [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 68
PDF Downloads: 69
Published
2024-12-31
How to Cite
RAZUMOVAK. М. (2024). Professional Judgment: Thinking, not Just Calculating. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit, (3-4), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.31767/nasoa.3-4-2024.04