Statistical Assessment of the Ecological Situation: The Case of the Republic of Azerbaijan

  • T. H. Tamrazov Research Institute of Crop Husbandry
Keywords: Environmental protection, ecological areas, ecological agriculture production, specially protected areas, economic efficiency


The economic development in a country depends on the continuous development of its regions. This issue can be effectively addressed by statistical assessment of the real situation in economic regions of a country by use of key sustainable development indicators. Development factors at regional level (ecological, economic, and social) are not studied as a complex, which raises the need for and importance of comprehensive statistical analyses of the data on environmental performance at region and country level. The article contains a statistical analysis of these indicators for the Republic of Azerbaijan. The period from early 2000s till 2017 is covered. The analysis is made on the official statistics of the Republic of Azerbaijan. The indicators under study include: distribution of land by purpose, specially protected areas, state nature reserves, air temperature, air temperature in Baku city, average annual precipitation, average annual precipitation in Baku city, amount of pollutants emitted in the air, domestic wastes generation etc. The analysis also demonstrates the need to improve the quality of the primary statistical data. Conclusions and recommendations provided in the article are formulated from the results of the statistical analysis.   


Download data is not yet available.


1. Ahmedov S. H., Muradov N. M. (2008). Ecology. The atmosphere pollution. Baku.
2. Bolshakov A. M., Krutkov V. N., Pucilo E. V. (1999). Evaluation and management of environmental risks to health rights. M.: Editorial URSS.
3. Böhringer C., Jochem P. (2007). Measuring the immeasurable – a survey of sustainability indices. Ecological Economics, 63, 1–8.
4. Strassburg B., Kelly A., Balmford A., Davies R., Gibbs H. et al. (2010). Global congruence of carbon storage and biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems. Conservation Letters 3:
5. Stern D., Common M., Barbier E. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development 24, 1151–1160.
6. Smith R., Muir R., Walpole M., Balmford A., Leader-Williams N. (2003). Governance and the loss of biodiversity. Nature, 426, 67–70.
7. Morse S. (2006). Is corruption bad for environmental sustainability? A cross-national analysis. Ecology and Society, 11, 22.
8. Bawa K., Dayanandan S. (1997). Socioeconomic factors and tropical deforestation. Nature, 386, 562–563.
9. Olsthoorn X. (2001). Carbon dioxide emissions from international aviation: 1950–2050. Journal of Air Transport Management, 7, 87–93.
10. Ghertner D., Fripp M. (2007). Trading away damage: quantifying environmental leakage through consumption-based, life-cycle analysis. Ecological Economics, 63, 563–577.
11. Food and Agriculture Organization (2007). FISHSTAT Plus: Universal Software for Fishery Statistical Time Series. Version 2.32. Rome: Fisheries Department, Fishery Information, Data and Statistics Unit.
12. Food and Agriculture Organization (2009). AQUASTAT: Global information system on water and agriculture. Rome: Land and Water Division.
13. Giam X., Bradshaw C., Tan H., Sodhi N. (2010). Future habitat loss and the conservation of plant biodiversity. Biological Conservation. In press.

Abstract views: 221
PDF Downloads: 128
How to Cite
Tamrazov, T. H. (2018). Statistical Assessment of the Ecological Situation: The Case of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit, (4), 18-27.