Selected issues of using international standards of auditing when assessing the application of the going concern basis by management personnel of a company
The article deals with selected issues of the application of international standards of audit in domestic practice. The source of the main problem, which hinders the development of a unified methodological approach to the application of international standards, is determined, and proposals for its solution are provided. Particular attention is paid to the methodological recommendations for reflecting the requirements of international standards in the auditor’s working papers.
The investment activity of foreign partners in Ukraine is conditional on the financial statement clarity for domestic business entities and their trust in them. While the former can achieved by the application of International Financial Reporting Standards, the latter is dependent on the application of International Standards of Auditing (ISA).
The purpose of the article is to develop a methodological approach to the application of ISA, based on clarification of their essence and nature.
The study of audit practice and opinions of users of audit reports shows that one of the key issues is compliance with the going concern basis of accounting by management personnel in preparing financial statements.
It can be concluded from the study that ISA do not conform to the definition of “standards”, being more similar with some kind of “rules”. It means that ISA constitute the rules for performing audit by focusing the auditor attention on a specific set of issues and objects. This approach allows for a certain extent of control over the completeness the audit process and for assuring selected aspects of quality.
2. Danilevskyi Yu. A., Shapiguzov S. M., Remizov N. A. & Starovoitova E. V. (2000). Audit [Auditing]. Moscow: ID FBK-PRESS [in Russian].
3. Honcharuk Y. A. (2002). Audyt [Auditing]. Lviv: Svit [in Ukrainian].
4. Davidov G. M. (2004). Audyt [Auditing]. Kyiv: Liga [in Ukrainian].
5. International Accounting Standards and Financial Reporting Standards: [Electronic Resource] / Official Website of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. URL: http://zakon3. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/929_010 [in Ukrainian].
6. Kulakovska L. P. & Picha Yu. V. (2009). Orhanizatsiya i metodyka audytu [Organization and methods of auditing]. Kyiv: Karavela [in Ukrainian].
7. Petrik O. A. (2003). Audyt: metodolohiya ta orhanizatsiya [Auditing: methodology and organization]. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
8. Proskurina N. M. (2011). Protsedurne zabezpechennya audytu. Teoriya ta praktyka [Procedures of auditing: theory and practice]. Kyiv: DP “Inform.-analit. ahentstvo” [in Ukrainian].
9. Redko A. Yu. (2008). Audyt v Ukrayini. Morfolohiya: [Audit in Ukraine. Morphology]. Kyiv: DP “Inform.-analit. ahentstvo” [in Ukrainian].
10. Savchenko V. Ya. (2002). Audyt [Audit]. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
11. Dictionary of philosophical terms (2011). 2nd ed., ext. and corrected. Kemerovo [in Russian].
Abstract views: 339 PDF Downloads: 168
Copyright (c) 2018 Scientific Bulletin of the National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.